About Progressive Psychic “Arthur, ease my minds” AI bot on his YouTube feed


NOTE to READER: This blog is a continuation (sort of) of my previous article: Progressive Psychic-Mediums.

I was, as usual, watching Arthur (ease your mind)‘s video with my wife last evening.  At about 51:20 a lady asks: “Will the US eventually stop funding the genocide in Gaza . . . ?”  Arthur answers “I say yes.”  “I say yes, people aren’t had it. You know.”

Here, without consulting his guides (I am assuming that is the case since he says “I say yes,” and not “My guides say yes.” ) that this is just his opinion.  This makes sense to me because I cannot imagine that legitimate Spirit Guides would say that Israel is committing Genocide because this is simply not true, and I believe that real guides  do not lie or repeat propaganda. On the other hand, it is obvious that Arthur believes that Israel is committing Genocide because he did not correct the lady. Here is the transcript:

 

Arthur has an AI driven app on his YouTube page that allows you to ask questions about the webcast and/or the transcript.  At first the AI denied that the phrase “genocide in Gaza” was even spoken by Arthur.  When I mentioned I had a screenshot the AI still insisted that Arthur did not use the phrase “genocide in Gaza” and in fact states that Arthur said “I did not say genocide in Gaza.”


Someone is lying through their teeth.  The transcript (see above) clearly shows Arthur speaking the phrase “genocide in Gaza,” yet the AI insists that he did not.

In my Astrological Natal Chart, it shows that I have Virgo ascending (or rising). This means that I am somewhat OCD about cleanliness and organization. My sons Jesse and Jordan are also thus afflicted.  Virgo rising also means that I can’t tolerate lying or liars.

I find it puzzling that none of the Progressive Psychic/Mediums have consulted their guides concerning Israel, but instead have just piled on to the popular Progressive opinion (propaganda) like lemmings running off a cliff. No research, no objective thinking.

Disclaimer: Keep in mind that I like these people and I find them 100% accurate when they speak of our current retarded POTUS and his fascist MAGA minions. Why have they swallowed the whole propaganda pie regarding the palestinians?


International Association of Genocide Scholars?


According to the International Association of Genocide Scholars, Israel is most definitely committing genocide in Gaza. They released a statement to the press, and this has been repeated across the InterWebs, so it therefore must be true.

Except, they didn’t list any of the criteria for determining whether or not a country is committing genocide against another, nor did they offer any evidence that their claims were true.

The internationally recognized definition of genocide, as codified in Article II of the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, consists of two main criteria: a specific mental intent and a set of prohibited physical acts. 
Mental element:Specific intent(dolus specialis)
The “specific intent” element requires proof that acts were committed with the explicit purpose of destroying a protected group, in whole or in part. This intent must target national, ethnical, racial, or religious groups, aiming to destroy the group as a group. Destroying a “substantial” part of the group is considered sufficient. 
Starting with this one, Israel has no intention now. not ever has had such an intention, to eradicate the palestinian population. The above mentioned International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) failed to prove this very important element of the UN Convention. As a matter of fact, NO ONE has been able to provide evidence that such is the case. I  speculate that the reason they did not bring this up is the very fact that they have no evidence.
Physical element: Prohibited acts
In addition to specific intent, at least one of five prohibited acts must be committed against the targeted group: 
  1. Killing members of the group.

Israel is at war with Hamas, the elected government of Gaza. It’s a war, so by very definition people will be killed.  I have always maintained that warfare is inherently genocidal. But the operative condition here is “intent.” Does Israel intend to wipe the palestinians off the fact of the Earth?  The answer is “no.”

What is interesting to me is that Hamas’ intent, and this is stated in their charter, is to eradicate Israel and all Jews from the Middle East:

Adopted during the First Intifada, the founding charter was explicitly antisemitic and called for the destruction of Israel. Key points include:
  • Destruction of Israel: Calls for the “annihilation” of Israel and its replacement with a Palestinian Islamic state across all of what was formerly Mandatory Palestine.
  • Religious conflict: Explicitly frames the conflict as a religious one, citing antisemitic tropes and a call to kill Jews.

By their own admission, Hamas intends to commit genocide, and they have committed acts that illustrate their resolve. This was especially true on October 7th, 2023, when Hamas terrorists invaded southern Israel and brutally murdered 1,200 non-combatants, including women, teens, children, infants and elderly people.

Physical element: Prohibited acts
In addition to specific intent, at least one of five prohibited acts must be committed against the targeted group:

2- Causing serious bodily or mental harm, such as torture or sexual violence.

On October 7th 2023, during their invasion of Israel, Hamas recorded themselves committing gang rapes against women and girls, leaving bodies with broken pelvises. They cut these girls breasts off; they drove nails through their vaginas; they tortured and murdered their victims and made children watch, then murdered the children. Infant bodies were found in microwaves and ovens, burned alive.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have NEVER, in their 80+ year history, committed such atrocities. 

3- Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to cause the group’s physical destruction, which can include deprivation of essential resources.

Israel has allowed thousands and thousands of kilos of food and medical supplies to be delivered into Gaza during the duration of this war. Hamas has, up until recently, hijacked such deliveries, ware housed the aid, and sold it back to Gaza citizens at inflated prices. Recently they have been deterred from hijackings, so they fire on Gaza civilians lined up to receive aid.

Therefore it is Hamas that inflicts conditions of life calculated to cause the group’s physical destruction.

4- Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, including forced sterilization or abortion.

This is not happening at all.  In fact, during the current war, 85,000 births have been recorded there. Prior to 10/7/2023, Gaza’s population was estimated at 2.3 Million. Sources state that 64,000 Gazans (including both military and civilians) have been killed during the past 698 days.  This means, that despite the on going war, the population of Gaza has increased to  2,321,000, or 21,000 more than before the war began.  

If Israel is committing genocide, as they are accused, they are failing miserable. In a genocide, the population does not increase.

5- Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group, aimed at dismantling the group’s identity. 

No one is doing that, although there have been unsubstantiated reports of Israeli children being kidnapped over the last 80 years.

So, who exactly is this International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS)? The Wikipedia reference has only been in existence since February 2018. The article claims that the IAGS was founded in 1994. It is interesting that we’ve only heard of this group since September 4th, 2025. It’s almost as it they were invented “out of the blue” to legitimize the genocide lies. It is interesting also that the only statement they have to offer, without any substantiating evidence, is that Israel “meets all the criteria” for committing genocide, yet, as we have stated at the very beginning of our post, the number one criteria is the nations intent, and no one has proved Israel has such an intent, and, this is important, Israel’s actions have shown that they have bent over backwards to minimize civilian casualties, as they have done in their entire 77 year history.

Here are some other opinions/observations concerning the IAGS:


The Democratic Progressive caucus just wrote me . . .


I had replied to a survey they had sent our over Facebook. Except, well you know, these surveys aren’t really surveys, they are ways to ask for money, so I completed the survey (which had absolutely no questions concerning Gaza or Israel), and then skipped the money parts.  Well, they wrote me back. “Where did you go?” they asked. So I replied thusly:

As long as you keep entertaining lies about Israel (“Genocide,” “Apartheid,” “Settler Colonialism,””Illegal occupation,” etc.,) I cannot, and will not send you even one penny. Now, if you were to renege on repeating the lies (see my blog on Israel: https://el.urgod.org/israel/) and if you were to censure “the squad” (honestly, I agree with and support everything else these ladies stand for. They are just WRONG on Israel).


This is why the charge of “genocide” against Israel is an vicious lie


Palestinian-American author Susan Abulhawa recently said that “Israelis should not feel safe anywhere in the world” and called the world to “wipe that vile colony from this earth.”

The irony of such a statement is staggering. Because the truth is simple: If Israel ever sought to “wipe” “palestinians” off the map, the capabilities are already in their arsenal. They have the technology, the firepower,  and the global reach to erase entire cities in hours. But they don’t. Not because they can’t. Because they won’t.

“Israel could “wipe” its enemies from the earth. They choose not to.”

And that is the moral difference.Israel is one of the most technologically advanced nations on earth. They have one of the world’s most sophisticated air forces, precision missile systems, and world-class cyber capabilities. Their intelligence apparatus is unparalleled in the region. At any moment, Israel could flatten Gaza, dismantle Hezbollah in Lebanon, or silence Iranian proxies across the region.Yet they don’t.They fight wars with restraint — often to their own detriment — because the moral fabric of our society demands it. Hospitals in Gaza aren’t rubble because the IDF spends millions on precision-guided munitions and warning systems to limit civilian casualties. It is why humanitarian aid still flows into Gaza, even while Hamas uses those same corridors to smuggle in weapons.

This moral calculus isn’t new.In 1948, when five Arab armies declared war to destroy the fledgling Jewish state, Israel could have expelled every Arab within its borders. Many nations throughout history would have done exactly that, especially in the aftermath of a genocide against their people. But Israel didn’t.Hundreds of thousands of Arabs remained and became citizens. Today, they sit in the Knesset, serve on the Supreme Court, and head hospital departments.The same restraint showed in 1967. After the Six-Day War, Israel controlled vast swaths of territory. Many voices demanded annexation and total expulsion. Instead, Israel offered “land for peace” — offers the Arab leadership rejected.

That pattern has repeated itself through history: after Camp David in 2000, after Israel’s peace proposal in 2008, and even after the Trump peace plan in 2020. The answer from “palestinian”  leaders has always been the same: no peace, no compromise, only continued violence.

“Israel could “wipe” its enemies from the earth. They choose not to.”

Every modern war tells the same story. In 2014, when Hamas used schools and hospitals as rocket launch sites, Israel issued evacuation warnings and dropped leaflets before striking. In 2023, after Hamas committed atrocities on October 7th — the largest mass slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust — Israel could have unleashed wholesale destruction on Gaza.Instead, they targeted infrastructure, avoided civilian zones when possible, and paused operations repeatedly to allow humanitarian aid — knowing full well Hamas would exploit those pauses. Even in the middle of a war, the IDF used phone calls, text alerts, and “roof knock” warnings to minimize civilian casualties, something no other military in the world attempts during combat operations. If you don’t know what “roof knocking” is, it’s a tactic the Israeli military invented to warn “palestinian” civilians before a strike. Instead of dropping a lethal bomb first, the IDF fires a small, non-lethal munition on the roof of a building to signal that a strike is imminent. It’s essentially a last warning: Evacuate now, because this location is being targeted. No other military in the world takes such extraordinary steps to minimize civilian casualties, even when those civilians are being used as human shields by terrorists.

And yet, despite this restraint, much of the world blames Israel for the destruction in Gaza. Images of rubble and suffering flood television screens and social media feeds, stripped of all context, and the easy — and lazy — narrative is that Israel is to blame. But the reality is far more complex, and far more damning for those who actually rule Gaza.Hamas embeds its terror infrastructure in civilian areas — schools, hospitals, apartment buildings, even mosques — not by accident, but by design. They fire rockets from rooftops and alleyways, store weapons in homes, and use civilians as human shields, knowing that any response from Israel will be broadcast globally as “proof” of cruelty. International law calls this a war crime; activists call it “resistance.”

What critics never acknowledge is that Israel invests enormous effort and risk to minimize civilian harm. No other military on earth drops warning leaflets, places phone calls, sends text alerts, and even fires “roof-knock” dummy rounds to urge civilians to leave targeted areas. And yet Hamas tells civilians to stay put, blocks their evacuation, and sometimes shoots those trying to flee — because their deaths are their greatest propaganda weapon. Blaming Israel for Gaza’s destruction ignores the core truth: Gaza is in ruins because Hamas chose war, and because it hides behind its own people to fight it. Israel did not choose this fight; Hamas did, with the full knowledge that their own population would pay the price. To pretend otherwise is not just dishonest; it is an inversion of morality.

And yet, for all the outrage directed at Israel, few stop to compare Israel’s conduct to that of other nations when faced with existential threats or devastating attacks. Contrast that with how other nations have responded to existential threats or major attacks. After Pearl Harbor, the United States firebombed Tokyo and dropped nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. After 9/11, the U.S. launched wars that reshaped the Middle East, with civilian casualties in the hundreds of thousands.Russia has leveled entire cities in Chechnya and Ukraine without a second thought. NATO bombed Belgrade for months. And yet Israel — facing an enemy that butchers its civilians, hides behind its own women and children, and vows to exterminate the Jewish people — still calibrates every strike with the intent to spare innocents. No one else in history fights like this, and yet no one else is more relentlessly accused of “genocide.” Those accusations collapse under the simplest examination of facts.

“Israel could “wipe” its enemies from the earth. They choose not to.”

If Israel wanted to wipe “palestinians” from the earth, Gaza would be empty within 24 hours. Instead, the “palestinian” population has quadrupled since 1948 and continues to grow year over year — even in Gaza, even under the supposed “genocide.” The numbers don’t lie. What does lie are the slogans chanted on college campuses and amplified by useful idiots who know nothing of the reality on the ground. Yes, there are “bad” Israelis. Extremists exist in our society. There are voices that call for collective punishment. But they are a minority, condemned by the majority of our society, our press, and our courts. Among “palestinians” , however, polls consistently show majority support for violence, for Hamas, for the destruction of Israel — not for peace, not for a two-state solution, but for annihilation. After October 7th, “palestinian” polling showed that over 70 percent of Gazans supported the attack. “Palestinian” children are taught from the youngest age that Jews are subhuman and that martyrdom is the highest goal. Their textbooks are filled with maps that erase Israel entirely, with lessons that glorify murder and demonize coexistence. This isn’t an accusation; it’s their own data, their own curriculum, their own media.

Do you know what Israeli children are taught? To cherish life — their own and the lives of others. They grow up with lessons about coexistence, with textbooks that talk about peace, about respecting their neighbors, and about building a future where two peoples can live side by side.They learn about the Holocaust, not to hate, but to understand the cost of dehumanization and to ensure “never again” applies to anyone. They are taught that the uniform of a soldier carries the burden of protecting civilians, not targeting them. In classrooms, they learn math and science, not martyrdom and murder.In summer camps, they sing about hope and renewal, not blood and vengeance. Israeli children are raised to see the humanity in others — even those who hate them — because that is what our culture, our history, and our ethics demand.That is why, time and again, peace has remained elusive. From the 1947 UN Partition Plan to the Oslo Accords to the Camp David talks, Israeli leaders have been willing to make painful concessions in the name of coexistence.

“Palestinians” leaders, backed by the majority of their people, have chosen violence. The result is the same every time: more death, more suffering, and more missed opportunities. “The Arabs never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity,” as said by Abba Eban, Israel’s foreign minister and ambassador to the United Nations during the 1960s and 1970s, after the Geneva Peace Conference of 1973, criticizing Arab leaders for rejecting opportunities for peace following the Yom Kippur War.Has anything changed since then? What drives Israel’s restraint is not fear or weakness, but a deep ethical foundation.

The Jewish tradition teaches that every life has infinite value — “whoever saves a single life, it is as if he has saved an entire world.” This ethos permeates Israeli society, from the soldier in the field to the policymakers in the war cabinet.It’s why, even after October 7th, Israelis debated morality while our dead were still being buried. It’s why we send aid to our enemies, treat “palestinian” children in Israeli hospitals, and dream — sometimes naively — of a future where coexistence is more than a slogan.The world often tries to paint this conflict in shades of gray, but there is a fundamental difference between a people who have the ability to destroy but choose restraint, and a people who fantasize about destruction but lack the power to achieve it. Israel could “wipe” its enemies from the earth. They choose not to. That choice is not weakness; it is strength — the strength of morality, of history, of a nation that values life even when surrounded by those who chant for death.And until Palestinian society undergoes its own moral reckoning, until it values life over martyrdom, there will be no true peace. As former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir said, “Peace will come when the Arabs love their children more than they hate us.” Because morality is not what you say when you are powerless. Morality is what you choose when you have power. And Israel, despite every provocation, continues to hold that bar incredibly high.

“Israel could “wipe” its enemies from the earth. They choose not to.”

An email from Duck L’Orange


Honestly, I do not know how I got on this mailing list. Reading it, it’s just one outlandish lie after another. Even the first line is a lie: I have never contacted the White House. I’ll put an asterisk next to every lie I found and bolded it:

Thank you for *contacting the White House.

This Labor Day weekend, President Donald J. Trump *continues to deliver historic victories for the American people.

As a direct result of President Trump’s *pro-growth, *pro-American energy agenda, this weekend, *gas prices are at their lowest price since 2020.  Additionally, *hotel rates are down about 11%, *domestic airfares are down 6% from last year, and *car rental costs are down 3%.  Just as President Trump promised, *America is becoming affordable again.

President Trump *continues to put American workers first.  *Blue-collar wages are rising, private sector *job growth is exploding, *domestic steel production is booming, and the President’s historic *trade deals and landmark tax cuts are *propelling unprecedented opportunity, growth, and success for American families.

American *pride is also roaring back.  This week, President Trump signed an Executive Order to restore respect, honor, and sanctity to the American flag and prosecute those who desecrate this universal symbol of our freedom, identity, and strength.  The *Trump Administration’s revolution of common sense continues—and once again, we are a Nation that cherishes our history and respects our great American traditions.

*Stable prices, booming jobs, and rising confidence are lifting every corner of our Nation—and President Trump is only getting started.

To learn more, visit WhiteHouse.gov.

Here is the email I replied with:

Do you get a commission for every lie you tell?  Because I can tell whenever Duck L’Orange (my name for our POTUS) tells a lie: his lips move. Thank Hashem, when and however tRump leaves office, no Republitard will ever serve in that office again.

My reply email bounced, because the email address it was sent to (which was coded into the original) was noreply@contact.whitehouse.gov  See, they don’t even have the guts to allow comment on their lies.


The Palestinian Myth: my review

The Palestinian Myth : How History is Being Rewritten to Erase Israel is a very well written piece of investigative journalism that should be required reading for every college student studying history, journalism, political science, sociology, and anyone interested in the history of the Middle East.

The real history of the myth takes us back to the time of the Roman occupation of Judea. The Bar Kochba revolt was an attempt to end Rome’s occupation but it failed, and the Romans renamed Judea Syria Palaestina  as a means of cultural suppression  and political control aiming to diminish Jewish identity and assert Roman authority in the region.  In effect, the “palestinians” are attempting to do exactly the same thing, two thousand years later.

It is interesting that the name “Palestine” as applied to the region has only occurred twice in history. The first time, as we have just mentioned, occurred when Rome was the occupying force. The second time happened after World War I, when the League of Nations awarded Great Britain the Mandate for Palestine (Sept. 29, 1923 to May 15, 1948) during which Britain occupied the region.

Prior to Sept. 1923, the name “Palestine” was rarely used to refer to the region. In Mark Twain’s 1869 travelogue, The Innocents Abroad he never describes inhabitants of the region as “palestinians.”  During the mandate period, only Jews referred to themselves as “palestinians.”  After Israel’s declaration of independence, Jews became Israelis and such institutions as “The Palestine Post,” became “The Jerusalem Post;” “The Palestine Philharmonic” became the “Israel Philharmonic.” The name change was adopted almost overnight.

When I lived in Israel in 1974, I did not meet a single Arab who referred to themself as “palestinian.”  The adoption of this term by the Arab community did not become common place until after 1967, when Yasser Arafat invented “Palestine” (at the instigation of Moscow).

 

5 reasons why Israel IS NOT committing genocide in Gaza


1. “Genocide” refers to the physical destruction of an entire group in whole or in part that has been targeted on the basis of its identity. This is not Israel’s objective in Gaza.

Raphael Lemkin, a Polish lawyer of Jewish descent, introduced the term genocide in 1944 to refer to events including the Nazis’ systematic extermination of Jews.

Lemkin explained the need for a new legal term to describe this horror, saying: “there has been no serious endeavor hitherto to prevent and punish the murder and destruction of millions…. there was not even an adequate name for such a phenomenon.”

The United Nations General Assembly recognized genocide as a crime under international law in 1946 and it was codified in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in 1948.

The Convention defines genocide as the commission of grave harm against members of a national, ethnic, racial or religious group – such as by killing, causing serious physical or mental harm, inflicting conditions that bring about physical destruction, imposing measures to prevent births or forcibly taking away children – with the intent to destroy the group as such.

Genocide means targeting members of a group because of their group identity and not something they are individually thought to have done.

Israel’s war is against Hamas: Israel is not seeking to destroy the Palestinian people or the Palestinian population of Gaza, which is what would need to happen in order to correctly apply the term “genocide.” Israel’s leaders have repeatedly asserted that their campaign in Gaza is solely against the terrorist organization Hamas. In fact, this type of military campaign is the exact opposite of reflecting an attempt to eliminate the Palestinian population.

2. Is Genocide Happening in Gaza? No. Israel is responding to a genocidal attack by Hamas

Since October 7, Israel’s objective in Gaza has been to destroy Hamas, a terrorist organization that carried out an unprecedented and brutal massacre against its people, including infants, children, elderly and disabled people.

A recent report concluded that Hamas used sexual violence as a tactical weapon of war during and after the October 7 attack that Hamas terrorists, using widespread and systematic sexual violence across geographic locations, and against hostages in captivity.

The goal of Hamas is to wipe Israel and Jews off the map, and in the aftermath of the October 7 terror attack, its representatives reiterated that they will never stop pursuing it. That’s an example of genocidal intent. 

While Hamas’s military capacity has been largely decimated by Israel, it still retains control over areas of Gaza and still continues to hold Israeli hostages.

Israel  is fully justified in using military force to respond to Hamas’s October 7 attack (read AJC’s explainer on Israel, Hamas, and international law). Israel’s use of military force in Gaza in the face of such an ongoing threat is not evidence of genocide, but completely consistent with international law.

3. Israel’s actions reflect its desire to spare Palestinian civilians from harm, not to deliberately harm them

The IDF’s practices also disprove claims of genocidal intent, as the Israeli military has repeatedly relocated Palestinian civilians within Gaza in an effort to ensure they are out of harm’s way as it undertakes its legitimate military campaign to destroy Hamas’s terrorist infrastructure.

In fact, since the start of the war, Israel has called for the temporary evacuation of t local populations in every part of the Gaza Strip where it deemed military action appropriate, and delays its ground operations in Gaza for weeks to allow civilians time to heed Israel’s warnings. It goes to great lengths to designate humanitarian corridors, or safe routes for Palestinian civilians to relocate from northern Gaza.

The IDF still endeavors to warn Gazans prior to attacks and has allowed humanitarian aid for civilians to be delivered under arrangements intended to prevent Hamas from diverting aid or controlling its distribution to reinforce its authority.

4. Hamas’ actions are designed to cause harm to Palestinian civilians and blame Israel 

In the months that followed the October 7 attacks, Hamas fired thousands of missiles on Israeli towns and cities. Those missiles were fired from civilian neighborhoods in the Gaza Strip, and from inside, next to, and underneath nominally civilian areas in Gaza like residential buildings, schools, mosques, and hospitals. Hamas’s actions transformed what were once protected civilian sites into legitimate military targets that Israeli forces are now working to dismantle.

Hamas puts civilians in harm’s way: While Israel goes to great lengths to avoid harming civilians as it targets Hamas’s weapons and operations centers in Gaza, Hamas typically proceeds to place Palestinian civilians directly in the path of the IDF’s targets. It has repeatedly called on Palestinian civilians to ignore Israel’s warnings about impending strikes and reportedly forced civilians to remain in the vicinity of military objectives, using them, like its hostages from Israel, as human shields.

Hamas’ actions are not only aimed at protecting its leaders, weapons, and property but also at vying for leverage in the public opinion war by inflating the number of civilian casualties.

Through its actions in Gaza, Hamas greatly increases the likelihood that military actions by Israel that are permissible in war and not prohibited by the law of war – let alone by the Genocide Convention – will nevertheless result in some harm to civilians. International law does not prohibit Israel from undertaking legitimate actions that will likely result in civilian harm unless the expected civilian harm will clearly exceed the anticipated military advantage from the attack.

While Israel takes many steps to minimize civilian harm resulting from its attacks against Hamas targets, as much as it can, it cannot eliminate it entirely. This is a horrible outcome of war, but it is not illegal, and it certainly is not genocide.

5.  The “facts” of the genocide charge don’t add up

Those who claim that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza not only misunderstand the legal definition of genocide and what the laws of war permit; they also base the charge on unsubstantiated claims, such as a report issued by Amnesty International.

It is unquestionable that many civilians in Gaza have died and even more have suffered immensely since October 7. However, there are so many “unknowns” with an important bearing on Israel’s conduct in this war that it is impossible to say with certainty that it is acting wrongfully.

  • The number of “innocents” vs. terrorists that have died: This is impossible to know given that the Ministry of Health in Gaza is under the control of and susceptible to influence by Hamas, and does not separate innocent civilians from fighters in its announced death tolls.
  • The circumstances in which numerous innocents have been killed in Gaza: This includes whether they died because of attacks carried out by the IDF or because of intentional or unintentional harmful actions by Hamas or other Palestinian armed groups. A key example is the explosion at Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza City, which the U.S. and other governments have determined was caused by a failed rocket fired by Palestinian Islamic Jihad and not, as Hamas, the Hamas-controlled Ministry of Health in Gaza, and many other sources claimed, by the IDF.
  • The nature of the military objective of attacks carried out by the IDF in which Palestinian civilians have died: Given that it is not possible for independent assessments to be conducted into whether a Hamas leader, tunnel, and/or weapons cache was present at the site of any specific IDF attack in Gaza, which Hamas still largely controls.

While some of those who claim Israel is engaged in genocide in Gaza are doing so for malign purposes – for example, justifying Hamas’ October 7 massacre by claiming Israel is ‘worse,’ many others have been deliberately misled. Their goal of ending the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza would be far better served by placing blame for that suffering where it lies – with Hamas – and supporting efforts to bring  about its defeat so that Palestinian and Israeli civilians can have the peace and security they all deserve as quickly as possible.

Accusing Israel of “genocide”  has been effective due to the emotional power of the word, and so it manipulates people who would be otherwise rational into embracing irrational claims that are provably wrong.


Am I a hypocrite?


Maybe.  There are lifestyle modalities that I have promoted and taught to people over the years that, for whatever reason, I haven’t been able to  practice myself. But I don’t believe that it is totally my own fault. Is it?

Back in High School, my best friend, Louis Dolmon gifted me with a copy of Robert Heinlein’s Stranger In A Strange Land (SiaSL).  This book had a major impact on me, and in fact still does to this day.  There were a few other novels of Heinlein’s that I enjoyed and which shared some of the same themes.  The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress, The Door Into Summer, and Friday, to name just a few.  The particular themes that I most responded to were those of Polyfidelity (group marriage), naturism, (social nudity) and intentional community.  I have taught the merits of all of these over my “Pagan” career, and encouraged people to practice them. However, personally, I have only partaken of one of these myself, and even then not for a very long time.  I live in Israel for the better part of 1974 in an intentional community; a kibbutz.

The rest? Not so much. Well, not at all. But we (Ceridwen and I) tried to make things manifest.

NATURISM (AKA, Nudism, AKA, social nudity):

Prior to Ceridwen, I was “married” to Qadisha, and lived in Santa Cruz County, CA. She knew of my interest in naturism, but oddly, never allowed me to be exposed to it, even though there was plenty of opportunity in Santa Cruz.  There were five clothing optional beaches, two  hot tub “spas” with community tubs, and there was Lupin Lodge up in the Santa Cruz mountains.  I went to a clothing optional beach exactly once, by myself.  I also went to Kiva a couple times, by myself. I also enjoyed a free pass to Lupin Lodge once.  I loved all of it, but I hated being by myself. Also, as I discovered at Lupin, single males are discouraged from this lifestyle. I like people. I wanted friends who had shared interests, but Qadisha, I guess, was “protecting” me. I remember going to Well Within once with Qadisha, who did not know that I knew the nature of the business.  She asked me to stay in the car while she went in to conduct some business (was she scoring some weed?).

While living in Santa Cruz, I joined the Church of All Worlds (CAW), and attended a meeting at the home of Tom and Joy Williams, who were leaders in CAW.  CAW (as it was inspired by SiaSL) held  a reputation for promoting polyfidelity and naturism. The meeting was intended to organize a “nest” (congregation) of CAW. Nothing really jelled with that, but I did meet the man who would become my Santa Cruz “best friend,” Duane Adam Rostoker (aka: “Adam Walks Between Worlds”).

In 1998 we moved from Santa Cruz to Ashland OR, and that was the end of opportunities for naturist adventures.

It was in Ashland that my relationship with Qadisha ended, and my relationship with Ceridwen began. It should be noted that Ceridwen, prior to meeting me, had regularly engaged in naturist activities. She lived in Santa Cruz, and there was/is an abundance of opportunity there to be “clothing optional.”

Ceridwen was the driving force that instigated the evolution of Order of the Mithril Star (OMS) (which Adam and I conceived) into the Reformed Druids of Gaia (RDG), and in fact RDG was her vision.

In 2004 we moved from Grants Pass OR to Eureka CA (where we still live today). The main reason was that OMS’ (and later RDG’s) sacred tree is the Coast Redwood (Sequoia Sempervirons). The thing is that there are no Redwoods in Oregon. Since OMS’ sacred tree is the Redwood, and we were the leaders of OMS, it seemed logical that we should live where the Redwood is indigenous. Eureka, in it’s heyday, was the center of the logging industry which reduced the Coast Redwood to 3.5% of what it once was. Happily, there hasn’t been any significant logging activity for about the past two decades.

RDG held yearly Reformed Druid gatherings at Humboldt Redwoods State Park. People were informed that these gatherings, owing to the privacy of the camp ground we retained, were clothing optional events. RDG’s course in how to be  a Druid, The Druid Path includes text promoting nudity for ritual and social activities, since RDG is most definitely an SiaSL inspired “organism.” So one might expect that some would take the opportunity to shed their cloths.

No one ever took their clothes off.

POLYFIDELITY:

This means a group relationship involving any number of men and women (Gay and/or Straight) who make a commitment to one another to love, honor, and protect each other; possibly raise children, and to restrict sexual activity to only those in the contract. Group Marriage.  One temporarily successful group marriage was the Kerista Commune. They lasted about twenty years, and it is said that a remnant of the group still exists on the island of Maui in Hawaii.

As an SiaSL inspired organization, we have promoted polyfidelity, and Ceridwen and I seriously sought after another wife or husband (or more). We actually had one really good shot at it. A woman from Southern California who was a member of OMS “courted” us for about three months, even visiting us when Ceridwen and I lived in King Salmon (just south of Eureka).  As things developed, it turned out that she wasn’t so much interested in a relationship with Ceridwen and I as she was in one with me.  Ceridwen and I are a package deal, so, no deal.  After that we never again met anyone who was at all interested. We had a series of female house mates over from 2004 until 2019, and we hoped that at least one of them would evolved into the “third” that we desired.  When it came time to replace our ageing queen size mattress, we opted for an Eastern King, to at least “prime the pump” for a polyamorous relationship to develop (an Eastern King will easily sleep three).

Prior to Ceridwen, Qadisha expressed interest in polyamory  (polyfidelities’ poor cousin). In a simple ritual, we pledged we would pursue polyamory. As it turned out, what she really wanted was to sleep with her ex-boyfriend in Eugene OR. She wasn’t interested in my pursuing a poly relationship (with anyone) at all.

Ceridwen had over time participated in various polyfideletous relationships, both when she lived in Madison WI, and again in Santa Cruz.

One of our Archdruids actually had a poly relationship involving her boy friend and another woman. It was not so successful. After about nine months, our AD came home from work to find that her boy friend and her “sister wife” had left her. This also happened to another couple whom I stayed with in Santa Cruz.

Ceridwen and I will turn seventy-two very soon. Her in  a few days from now, and myself in mid-November. We haven’t totally given up on acquiring a “sister wife” or “brother husband,”  but we’re not going to hold our breathe either.

INTENTIONAL COMMUNITY:
We’ve had a business plan and outline for a  “Druid Monastery” for well over twenty years now (click here) but we’ve experienced nothing but tsuris for our efforts. When we first exposed OMS members to the idea, we were inundated with a lot of complaining from members, that we couldn’t possibly raise the kind of money for the infrastructure we would require, and “…anyway it’s just yours and Ceridwen’s selfish retirement plan.”

Over the last twenty-five years, we’ve raised $1,050 towards this plan. So, there’s still hope, right?

 

 


Had a chat with “Grok” today


In this case “Grok” is not simply a Martian vernacular word from Heinlein’s Stranger In A Strange Land, rather, Grok is a conversational AI chatbot developed by xAI, Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company. It’s designed to be a powerful assistant that can answer questions, generate text, create images, and even write code. Grok is known for its ability to access real-time information through X (formerly Twitter) and its “rebellious” streak, which allows it to tackle “spicy” questions often avoided by other AI models.

I asked Grok about the Reformed Druids of Gaia (RDG).  Here is what  “she” told me:  “The RDG was co-founded by Ceridwen Seren-Ddaear and Sybok Pendderwydd (aka: Robert M. Larson), in 1996.  Her real name is Ceridwen Arseneau. Ceridwen and Robert are married and they also co-founded the Order of the Mithril Star together.”

Several things are just so wrong in this. First of all, Ceridwen’s real name is Karyn Arseneau. She has used the pseudonym “Ceridwen Seren-Ddaear” throughout her career as a neo-pagan elder/practitioner. I have used the pseudonym “Sybok Pendderwydd” off and on throughout my pagan career as well. I have NEVER used the name “Robert Larson.”  Order of the Mithril Star (OMS) was founded by myself and Duane Adam Rostoker (aka, “Adam Walks Between Worlds”) in  1996 at Big Basin Redwoods State Park, following a “Bring Back the Snakes” party at nearby Boulder Creek Brewery circa St. Patrick’s Day.  RDG was founded by myself and Karyn Arseneau around the Pagan feast of Mabon in 2006.

Grok provided some history of RDG:  “Specific to leadership requirements, circa 2013-2014 there was a mandate issued by the retiring Archdruid that his replacement (as well as those in other RDG leadership roles) must be politically far left and/or affiliated with the Green Party (USA residents).”

This is only partially true. RDG members are expected to be Progressive in their political leanings, but there was never a “mandate” issued by a “retiring Archdruid” (whom I guess is me, but rest assured I never issued such a requirement). I can especially reassure you that I have never endorsed the Green Party, which, in at least the last decade, has proven itself to be radically antisemitic.

“Specific to leadership requirements, circa 2013-2014 there was a mandate issued by the retiring Archdruid that his replacement (as well as those in other RDG leadership roles) must be pansexually (or at least bisexual) polyamorous naturists.”

Another bald-faced lie. No such “mandate” has ever been issued. However, RDG (and it’s parent group, OMS) are heavily influenced by Robert Heinlein’s Stranger In A Strange Land, which depicts polyamory and naturism as lifestyle choices. I have written extensively on these topics over the years.

“Unusual pattern of RDG Third Degrees approaching RDNA Third Order Druids requesting the secret Third Order Ordination liturgical scripts There is the perception in the RDNA that RDG Third Degrees are required to attempt to acquire the RDNA scripts. The manipulative sense of entitlement presented is mildly to harassingly disturbing.”

We were formed as the result of a  “vision” of  Karyn’s of seeing Reformed Druidism expanded to a planet wide paradigm, rather then the Reformed Druids of North America’s (RDNA) limitation to just the North American continent.  That’s why we are “of Gaia.”  As for our ordination of Third Order candidates (yes, we call them “Orders,” not “degrees”) requiring such candidates to attempt to procure RDNA’s 3rd Order Scripts — that’s just bull  feces.  It is true that VERY early on we did attempt to find some examples of such scripts, (just as other pagan groups might try to procure materials from groups they are closely related to, which is VERY common) it was found that we could come up with our own scripts (which currently vary from Archdruid to Archdruid and from Grove to Grove).  

These three “accusations” are the usual broadbrush attempt to discredit us. I am very sure that these attempts did not come from any RDNA sources, as we have never had anything but friendship and mutual respect from members and officers of the RDNA. No, I suspect that this originated with members of the N-RDNA (New Reformed Druids of North America) which is a group which officially schismed from the RDNA in 1976 (instigated  by Isaac Bonewits). Some NRDNA members are “embarrassed”  by this and frequently attempt to “blur the line” between their schismatic group and the legitimate RDNA, often characterizing themselves in the role of “spokes persons” for the RDNA. They have been highly critical of the RDG since it’s conception, and particularly because of our close associating with the lifestyles promoted by the Church of All Worlds (CAW) (specifically polyamory and naturism) and so spread outright propaganda and insinuations concerning sexual lifestyles among RDG members.  Very much like how Christians attack their critics: there is always some accusation of sexual abnormality.

Now, getting back to our initial topic here:  I am a tad curious as to why my name, Ellis Arseneau, did not come up in Grok’s “research(?).  My pseudonym (Sybok Pendderwydd) certainly did, as did Karyn’s (Ceridwen Seren_Ddaer) but Karyn’s real name did appear.  I suppose that over the years I have been too zealous at keeping my public persona private (and my employment).  Now that I am retired and in my 70’s such precautions no longer seems required.

BUT — who the hell is Robert M. (or C.M. Larson?  I certainly have never use that moniker and Karyn was surprised when I told her she was married to him! LOL!!!


Anti-Zionist (antisemitic) protests as Arcata’s City Council meeting(s)


NOTE to READER: This post got me placed in “NextDoor Jail” for six weeks (which is to say I was denied access to my NextDoor account). I am afraid we are becoming a fascist state.

It’s becoming a bad habit.  Antisemitic protesters have been regularly showing up at Arcata City Council meetings, spreading their insidious lies and propaganda.  The latest protest was especially vile.

First off, news anchor Erica Sutherland began the report by calling the Gaza/Israel war a “genocide,” (which I wrote to her about) but the real “star” of the show was this absolutely deranged woman who was screaming at the top of her lungs about how the city council should be ashamed of themselves for not supporting Palestine. Then she demanded that they divest from CalPers (which apparently has investments in Israeli businesses). She was very disruptive, disrespectful, and, well, at one time I worked as a mental health technician, and I think she’d be a good candidate for Thorazine.

I wrote to Erica Sutherland:
“You called the situation in Gaza “… the ongoing genocide.” Genocide requires the INTENTION to wipe out a people. If anything Israel has bent over backwards to keep civilian casualties to a minimum. Stop spreading Hamas propaganda! I’m a huge fan of yours. Please take my concerns seriously.”
“See my blog for the whole truth about Israel: https://el.urgod.org/everything-israel/”

Rather than address my concern, Erica excused herself:
“Hey you need to email Ross. I didn’t write the story. So I’m not informed about this situation. Email news@redwoodnews.tv”

So, I did:
“Last night (I watch the 11:00 stream on Zeam) Erica Sutherland started the story by calling Israel’s war with Hamas a “genocide.”  Although it has become popular among some Progressives (I am one) to characterize the situation as a “genocide perpetrated by Israel,” this is not the case at all. What is being repeated is Hamas propaganda. As a journalist, you are charged with telling the truth, not spreading lies. I don’t want to get into a long diatribe about this, but please, take the time to read my blog on the subject: https://el.urgod.org. Scroll down the right-hand menu to “EVERYTHING ISRAEL.”

Ross, I admire your work and that of the whole Redwood News team. I’ve been watching since my wife and I moved to Eureka in 2004. Please endeavor to speak the truth about Israel, and stop just repeating what is popular.

Namaste!”

He wrote back almost immediately:

Hello sir, 

I’ll need to get our reporter who interviewed the protesters on this topic.     Here is the story as we aired it. 
We said this in the introduction to the story: 

LAST NIGHT TWO DIFFERENT PROTESTS WERE HELD AT THE ARCATA CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND TENSIONS WERE HIGH.  ONE GROUP WAS PROTESTING ARCATA’S ALLEGED INVESTMENTS IN ISRAEL AND DEMANDED

THE CITY DIVEST DUE TO THE ONGOING GENOCIDE IN GAZA. 
What we SHOULD have said was; 

” ….. Demanded the city divest due to what the protesters call
the ongoing genocide in Gaza.”    

There is a big difference in whether Redwood News is saying there is an ongoing genocide in Gaza and  what the people in the context of the report believe is occurring in Gaza.

You are correct.  I will discuss it with the reporter/producer.   

Shame on us for not catching the way that intro was presented. 

Thanks for sending us your concerns. 

Ross Rowley 
News Director – Redwood News
KIEM-NBC3 / KVIQ-CBS17
Eureka, CA
707-443-6666 / 707-496-0626

I feel really good about this.  I feel vindicated. Here is my final response to Ross:

“Thank you for your due diligence.
Actually, it has happened more than once over the past year. Abraham Nevaro (sp?) repeated the same phrase a few months ago in another story concerning local protesters.
I didn’t say anything at the time. But with the rapid escalation of antisemitism in our country I think active correction of these errors is way overdue.

Again, than you for your attention to this matter.”

Ross Rowley’s email address in news@redwoodnews.tv